Tuesday, 23 January 2018

Labour Party: It is not anti-Semitic to criticize Israel

Labour Party: It is not anti-Semitic to criticize Israel

Criticizing Israel is not anti-Semitic but there is a Zionist Witch-hunt going on across the United Kingdom.

Labour Party activists are being hunted from within the Labour Party and some of them are being expelled.

The CAA - Mossad within Number Ten Downing Street - has self-declared links with the British Prime Minister and with Police Forces in the United Kingdom that are being used as part of a Zionist-organised persecution of anybody who dares to stand against Zionism or dares to criticize Israel's actions in Palestine including the deportation of African refugees that are being thrown out by the government of Israel that is carrying out military operations in Syria and talking about annexing the West Bank - a meeting of the Likud Party supported further annexation of territories that were not party of the original Jewish State of Israel as sanctioned and authorised by the Organisation of the United Nations in 1948.

In the meantime civil freedoms in the United Kingdom are being eroded and anti-Terror legislation is being used by Zionist organisations to persecute anybody who dares to criticize Israel or questions its propaganda apparatus.

As part of the destruction of civil freedoms, Habeas Corpus and the Presumption of Innocence have been technically abolished. Today, everybody is guilty until proven innocent. Detention without trial for political reasons is now a reality in the United Kingdom turning the clock back to the times of Autocratic Rule in which Monarchs could imprison and execute political opponents.

 
Sadly, this is happening in the United Kingdom in which in some cases the names of those arrested and put on trial are kept secret as if the authorities were afraid of public opinion. Secrecy is often a synonym of Dirty.

British Soldiers, people who put their lives on the line of fire for Queen and Country, are being kept in British jails before trials have even started and remanded in custody. Trust, what Trust? Justice, what justice?

Monday, 22 January 2018

Henry Bolton: British Mass Media not even remotely interested in substance politics

Henry Bolton: British Mass Media not even remotely interested in substance politics.

As Henry Bolton, UKIPs Leader, prepares himself to make a statement this afternoon at 4:00pm in Folkestone, the British Massi Media - presumed defenders of public freedoms - are only interested in superficial issues and innuendo.

Whether his girlfriend had or hand't racist views is absolutely irrelevant. The girlfriend is now history since they have both parted company. Then was the vote of confidence and the resignation of a deputy and an aide. What has happened from a substantial point of view? Absolutely nothing. There is no discussion about policies whatsoever.

In the meantime Nigel Farage and Arron Banks are reportedly talking about new political developments. Is this news? Not at all. Nigel Farage and Arron Banks have been talking about new political developments for a very long time - in fact since right after the Referendum on the EU. I spoke with Arron Banks about plans during a business event in London a few months ago. Since then there was another leadership election in which Ann Marie Waters was not successful and left UKIP to form another political organisation called For Britain.

Scandals or pseudo scandals are what the mass media specialise on even when there are very important issues - non related to UKIP - that need to be talked about. How what is happening in UKIP right now is relevant in the grand scheme of things? Well, it isn't relevant. In the meantime, political forces are getting ready for local elections in London where Councillors are going to be elected in all London boroughs. This is what we should be talking about but attention is diverted from the main issues to talk about rubbish.

Friday, 19 January 2018

National Action: British authorities and the mass media are trying to invent chocolate all over again

National Action: British authorities and the mass media are trying to invent chocolate all over again.

A headline published by The Independent on 8 September 2017 very much reflects the way of thinking of the British Establishment. They believe that banning a political organisation the said organisation will no longer exist. This is cuckooland thinking. You can ban and ban and ban and the organisation will continue to exist simply because it doesn't need to operate within a democratic framework.
A political movement (Politische Bewegung) doesn't have the constraints of a political party that needs to stay within the limits of the Electoral System. For many years, the British Establishment has been attempting to ban or derail Nationalist Political Parties like National Front, the British National Party, UKIP and others. The end result has been that unable to express their ideas within a democratic framework thousands of former political activists are now joining para-political organisations like National Action and others by the thousands either as members or sympathisers. These are the political realities that so called mainstream political parties have created and continue to promote.

Extremism can only be fought against in the ballot box. Using legislation introduced by now former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith designed to combat Islamic Terrorism to persecute individuals for political purposes will backfire in a big way. People are being sent to jail and kept in jail before they are even proven guilty of any alleged crimes. Habeas Corpus? Non existing. Detention without trial is the new reality and the whole burden of proof has been turned upside down. Before, everybody was innocent until proven guilty. Now, everybody is guilty before proven innocent. This is a mockery of the legal process and will completely destabilise British Society that is now run by the mobs. Even a Presidential visit of a duly elected US President was cancelled because of the pressure exerted by mobs and Universities are no longer centres for education but centres for political persecution and political discrimination. People are being kept in jail merely because they have been accused and we dare to criticise North Korea.

The Independent says that 'National Action is evading authorities by taking on new names - allegedly including Scottish Dawn and NS131 - in a technique used prolifically by Anjem Choudary's Islamist Network'. Is this news? For goodness sake, the said technique is as old as the world and the authorities should have foreseen that as soon as one name gets banned another name will pop up. The newspaper reports that a former detective said Police are left powerless to arrest neo-Nazis under new names. It takes weeks or months to take a case to Court and by the time the case is dealt in court names would have changed a few times. They are chasing smoke clouds driven by Political Correctness that is leading to violations of fundamental Human Rights.

A woman stands in court accused of composing, singing and posting on Internet a song that is according to the accusing party 'detrimental and deeply offensive to Jews'. They forget to mention that in the song Alison Chabloz deeply criticizes Jewish violations of Human Rights in Palestine. Keeping Palestinians in deplorable conditions is something that they are willing to forget about because 70 or so years ago Jews were persecuted in Europe. The Gaza Strip has been carpet bombed a few times, ten of thousands of Palestinian homes were destroyed and scores (thousands of thousands of Palestinian men, women and children were either killed, maimed or injured but all is forgiven because 70 or so years ago Jews were persecuted in Europe). So anyone who engages in criticism, condemning abuses in Palestine is due to be silenced by being accused of being a Nazi, a Fascist, an anti-Semite and so forth. This is the logic of Political Correctness that certain minorities are openly and abusively using to defend what is indefensible from a Human Right standpoint.

In Britain, there are stringent laws to deter people from engaging in acts of violence and the present political environment amounts to repression that will produce the pressure cooker effect. Those promoting repression will produce exactly what they are trying to avoid. People need to be able to vent their anger without engaging in acts of violence but the more we are made to feel that we live in a Police State the worse things will be.






Wednesday, 17 January 2018

Alternative für Deutschland: Germany's Official Opposition

Alternative für Deutschland: Germany's Official Opposition

A deal between CDU/CSU and SPD literally means that Alternative für Deutschland is Germany's Official Opposition and therefore duly entitled to have representatives in every single Committee of Germany's Federal Parliament.

Since CDU/CSU have been steadily loosing public support and this is why Angela Merkel's finds herself in the present predicament and since SPD is a choice of last resort since SPD itself lost public support due to its association to CDU/CSU in a coalition government, the way is open towards an even more successful Alternative für Deutschland in the coming years.

We anticipate that highly unpopular policies forced upon the German government by the United Kingdom exit from the European Union - ie. tax rises required by the coalition agreement and tax rises to fill up the gap in the European Union budget, will mean that German taxpayers will be forced to pay even more. This comes at the time when the budget for the reunification process is being capped or reduced with obvious political repercussions. Under the new coalition government, Germans will get less and will pay more for whatever they get. This is not exactly a vote winner.


Friday, 12 January 2018

Germany: More than 3 months without a government and coalition is not a certainty

Germany: More than 3 months without a government and coalition is not a certainty

An image that speaks volumes: the facial expression of Angela Merkel tells things as they are and a set of conditions that will not go down well with German voters.

Despite the fact that Britain's withdrawal will mean higher German contributions to the EU budget, coalition talks are heading in the direction of making a statement explicitly saying that German contributions will be increased as one of the requirements that must be met for a deal between CSU and SPD.

As part of the deal,  CDU will be forced to speed up the phasing out of the country's coal industry. Something that will go against both businesses and workers and it will lead to a higher dependency on other energy sources including oil and will lead to a wave of job losses of those employed by the coal industry.

There is also the added issue of increasing supply of monies to other EU countries for the sake of economic and social convergence, something that those who will have to pay for it will most likely oppose. Neither of these measures is a vote winner and this will most certainly affect an already embattled CDU, after a historical disastrous Federal Election.

Health Insurance contributions are yet another headache for Angela Merkel. SPD asked for equalisation of contributions for Healthcare meaning that, if there is a deal, employers will have to pay more for their employees healthcare.

The issue of Immigration and Immigration Control is also at the forefront in the exploratory talks between CDU and SPD with winds that blow in the direction of less Immigration. Angela Merkel knows that Immigration is an important issue and also knows that if she is seen as somebody that wants to maintain the status quo she will lose, once again, to Alternative für Deutschland and others who are against present levels of immigration.

Parties stated that these were merely exploratory talks and if at the end of the process there is no agreement there would be a new Federal Election and Angela Merkel might not be the candidate leading CDU as discontent within the CDU/CSU is rising.

Friday, 5 January 2018

Alison Chabloz on trial

Alison Chabloz on trial


The outspoken British singer is yet another victim among those who actually believe that there is Freedom of Speech - or in her case Freedom to Sing.

There isn't Freedom of Speech when a minority is able to oppress the majority imposing a regime of fear in which people end up being afraid of saying anything just in case it might lead them to trouble.

Why Jews were so hated for centuries? There are fundamental reasons for that. Some of them were what we could define as parasites that using money to exert undue influence generated a life of misery for millions.

They did it before when they benefited directly from European wars, selling weapons and 'investing on all sides'. This is the reason why an English King decided to throw them out of England centuries ago. Whether in England, Germany, Spain or in several other countries they were usually identified as exploiters and addicted to use every subterfuge for their own selfish interests regardless of the consequences.

The Middle East and what happens in Palestine is clear example of such behaviour. After coming as refugees at the end of World War Two and after  been given the opportunity to create a homeland for themselves, they decided that what they received in 1948 was not enough and then proceeded to try and take everything else. Two State Solution? No way. They are now planning to annex the West Bank and soon they will turn their anger against the Gaza Strip that they have carpet bombed destroying ten of thousands of family homes and leaving a wake of corpses of men, women and children in the process.

Murder became a synonym of Israel and despite calls made by the Organisation of the United Nations, Israel continues to violate fundamental Human Rights imprisoning children in prisons for adults.Anybody who dares to criticize Israel's violations ends up being called Nazi, Fascist and Racist notwithstanding the fact that Israel prepares itself to expel African refugees 'because Israel wants to maintain the Jewish identity of Israel'. Are the ones in charge of implementing such policies the descendants of those who complained about ill treatment under National Socialist Germany?

The policies of occupation and annexation that they so much criticise when implemented by others are fully supported by the Jewish State of Israel that is the implementation of Mein Kampf  (If you can take it and you can keep it, it is yours). Next time somebody talks about National Socialist Germany, look at what Israel is doing in Palestine.

Israel is a theocratic racist state that will stop at nothing to get its way. Zionists are worst than the ones they criticise.



Wednesday, 3 January 2018

Israel: Victims turned into Victimisers

The so called victims of the Holocaust are doing to others what they say that it was done to their ancestors under National Socialist Germany. They violate every rule in the book when it comes to Human Rights. They have taken over land that is not rightfully theirs using a precept stated in Mein Kampf (If you take it and can keep it, it is yours). A brief look at the map of 1948 and at today's map shows that they are an expansionist nation that doesn't give a damn about the rights of others. While they promote the so called Multicultural agenda outside Israel, inside Israel they promote a racist regime that pushes aside those that don't fit in with their racist agenda.